For centuries, the question of who constitutes the people of God has been a point of theological discussion. Many still hold to the notion that “ethnic” Jews remains the chosen people, despite the clear testimony of Scripture and the Church Fathers that the true Israel has always been those who are faithful to God—now fully realised in the Church. Christ Himself made this known through His parables, and the Apostles made it explicit: the Old Covenant has been fulfilled, and those who reject Christ are no longer part of the chosen people.
One of Christ’s most telling parables concerning the fate of Israel and the nature of the true people of God is found in Matthew 22:1-14—the Parable of the Wedding Feast. In this story, a king prepares a great wedding banquet for his son. He first invites those who were originally called—symbolizing Israel—but they refuse to come. Some ignore the invitation, while others mistreat and even kill the king’s servants, representing the prophets and ultimately Christ Himself. In response, the king destroys their city (a foreshadowing of the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70) and then extends the invitation to others—bringing in those from the highways and byways, representing the Gentiles and the faithful remnant of Israel who accept Christ.
The meaning is unmistakable: the kingdom of God is no longer exclusive to “ethnic” Jews. The rejection of the Messiah led to their exclusion, and the invitation was extended to the whole world. The true people of God are now those who respond to the call and enter the wedding feast of the Lamb—the Church.
The Apostle Paul expands on this reality in Romans 11, where he uses the analogy of an olive tree to describe the fate of Israel and the inclusion of the Gentiles. He speaks of Israel as the cultivated olive tree, but because of the unbelief of the Jewish people, many of its branches were cut off. In their place, wild branches—Gentiles—were grafted in. However, he warns the Gentiles not to become arrogant, for God can graft the Jews back in if they turn to Christ.
This passage makes clear that lineage alone does not determine one’s place in God’s covenant. It is faith in Christ that decides who remains part of the tree. St Paul explicitly states in Galatians 3:28-29:
“There is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither bond nor free, there is neither male nor female: for ye are all one in Christ Jesus. And if ye be Christ’s, then are ye Abraham’s seed, and heirs according to the promise.”
The seed of Abraham is no longer defined by bloodline, but by faith in Jesus Christ.
The early Church Fathers consistently affirmed that the Church is the true Israel, and that those who rejected Christ forfeited their place among God’s people. One of the most powerful voices in this regard is St John Chrysostom, who wrote a series of sermons titled Adversus Judaeos (Against the Jews). In them, he makes clear that the privileges of the old Israel have been revoked due to their rejection of Christ:
“The Jews were called children of God, yet they were cast out. They were once honored with the adoption, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the Law, the service of God, and the promises. But they lost all these when they rejected Christ.” (Adversus Judaeos I, 6)
Chrysostom was not alone in this teaching. St Justin Martyr, in his Dialogue with Trypho, states that Christians are the true spiritual descendants of Abraham:
“For the true spiritual Israel… are we who have been led to God through this crucified Christ.” (Dialogue with Trypho, 11)
Similarly, St Augustine wrote:
“The Old Testament is fulfilled in the New; the New Testament is hidden in the Old. The promises given to Israel belong now to the Church.” (Contra Faustum 4.10)
The consensus of the Fathers is clear: the promises made to Israel were fulfilled in Christ, and the Church is now the recipient of the covenant. Ethnic Israel, apart from Christ, no longer holds a special status.
Despite this clear biblical and historical teaching, many modern Christians—particularly in dispensationalist Protestant circles—continue to assert that “ethnic” Jews remains the chosen people and that the modern nation-state of Israel has a special role in God’s plan. While it is true that eschatological passages such as those describing the rebuilding of the temple in Ezekiel and Zechariah contain imagery that some interpret as literal, the New Testament reorients this understanding toward Christ. The Apostle Paul repeatedly teaches that believers are the true temple of the Holy Spirit, and Christ Himself, when speaking of the destruction of the temple, pointed to His own body as its fulfillment. It is entirely possible that certain prophetic events may have geopolitical dimensions (and I do not rule out the rebuilding of the Temple in Jerusalem as sign of the End-Times), but the Church has always recognised that the promises of God are not ultimately tied to an earthly state but to the coming of Christ’s kingdom.
Christian Zionism, which places its hope on the modern state of Israel, risks undermining the centrality of Christ’s salvific work. By insisting that the prophecies of the Old Testament must be fulfilled through the physical restoration of Israel, proponents of this view inadvertently diminish the role of the Cross and the Resurrection. They assert that political events are the linchpin of God’s redemptive plan, thereby casting doubt on the necessity of personal faith in Jesus Christ.
Such an approach, while seemingly affirming a biblical narrative, ultimately contradicts the apostolic teaching that salvation is found solely in Christ. St John Chrysostom, in his Adversus Judaeos, lamented the rejection of Christ by the old covenant. St Justin Martyr affirmed that the true Israel is not defined by blood but by faith in Christ. St Augustine likewise declared that the promises once given to Israel are now fully realised in the Church.
It is also worth acknowledging that the reality on the ground in the Holy Land is far more complex than doctrinal disputes. Many Christian pilgrims visit sacred sites with hearts full of reverence and expectation. Yet, there have been disheartening encounters where acts of disrespect mar the pilgrimage experience. In a particularly painful incident, I recall carrying a cross from the Anglican Cathedral of St George up to the Garden of Gethsemane some fourteen years ago, only to be spat upon by individuals who saw in this act an affront to their own Jewish identity. Such incidents, though not reflective of an entire people, serve as a stark reminder of the tensions that persist in the land where ancient faiths intersect. These experiences of hostility underscore a broader issue: the dangers of reducing the spiritual heritage of God’s people to national or ethnic identity. When the focus shifts from the universal call to repentance and redemption in Christ, it opens the door to pride, division, and even hatred.
In navigating these turbulent times, Christians must remain steadfast in the truth that God’s covenant is fulfilled in the Church. As St Justin Martyr observed in his Dialogue with Trypho, the true spiritual Israel comprises those led to God through the crucified Christ. Similarly, St Augustine affirmed that the promises given to Israel are now embodied in the Church, a people defined not by blood but by faith.
The insistence on an acceptance of modern Israel as the Biblical one, and thus a notion that it can do no wrong, often leads to political entanglements and a dangerous conflation of spiritual truth with earthly power. It distracts from the need for personal conversion and the communal transformation that marks the true people of God. Instead, Christians are called to bear witness to the living Christ, whose sacrifice redeems and whose resurrection ushers in a new covenant for all who believe.
The truth is undeniable: the Church is the true Israel of God. This is not a matter of race or bloodline, but of faith. As the Wedding Feast parable shows, the old guests were invited but refused; so, the King called others to take their place. As St Paul explains, the unbelieving branches were cut off, and others were grafted in. As the Fathers taught, the promises belong now to the Church, not to those who reject Christ. Christ is the fulfillment of all that Israel was meant to be, and His Bride, the Church, is the true Israel. Those who seek salvation must come not to an earthly nation, but to the Body of Christ, where the true people of God are gathered—Jew and Gentile alike, united in the covenant of grace.
I am concerned at the divisiveness and some of the assumptions in this article.
I wonder how much of the hostility some Jews express towards Christians is a response to past persecution and the belief that the Church has replaced them as God’s people. I wonder how much this belief of the Church is based upon us judging the Jews for crucifying Christ. Jesus said “Father forgive them for they know not what they do.” God’s desire is that we all become one in Christ Jesus. Throughout the Crusades the Jews were persecuted, massacred, displaced and forced to convert. Not much seems to have changed in much of the Church’s attitude to Jews.
In Romans, Paul does not negate the root (Israel and the Old Testament) …. “ if you do boast, remember it is not you that support the root but the root that supports you. “ (Romans 11:18)
He also says (11:23-32)
And even those of Israel if they do not persist in unbelief, will be grafted in again…
…. a hardening has come upon part of Israel until the full number of Gentiles has come in…And so all Israel will be saved…. Out of Zion will come the deliverer; he will banish ungodliness from Jacob……. ie. Salvation for the Israelites will also come through faith in Jesus.
All have been disobedient. All can receive God’s mercy.
So, yes, salvation is through faith in Christ alone. At this time, until the full number of Gentiles has been saved the Israelites hearts are still hardened but there will come a time when many Israelites will receive Christ and be saved.
When Timothy wrote “All scripture is inspired by God and is useful for teaching, for reproof, for correction and for training in righteousness “ he was speaking of the Old Testament. There was
no New Testament at that time.
I am puzzled at the assertion that Christian Zionism places its hope on the modern state of Israel. I believe that salvation is through faith in Christ and Christ alone, that through His death and resurrection I became a part of His body and that my hope is absolutely in Him and His Kingdom both here and in eternity.
However I also see the scriptures very clearly prophesying that the state of Israel will be reestablished before Christ returns, and see this as very important. Ezekiel 36 and 37 are extremely interesting in this regard. Here, long after the Northern Kingdom of Israel (ten of the tribes) has been exiled and scattered throughout the lands occupied by Assyria, it is prophesied that Israel and Judah (the Jews) will be reunited. There is a fascinating documentary which seems to show that the ten lost tribes are still aware of their heritage and are beginning to return to Israel which, if this is true, is nothing short of a modern day miracle.
https://youtu.be/nIbgOCsEwpE
In case the link doesn’t work the title is Documentary: The Ten Lost Tribes of Israel. It’s on YouTube.
Thank you George for all you are doing. May all of us who love Christ seek truth together and be united in Him.
Thank you dear George. This message is much needed today.
Scofieldism has rendered the cross of Christ ineffectual to save. Rather now, salvation is dependent upon one's works: of prayer for and support of the modern state of Israel.
Whole Gentile nations are now believed to be subject to judgement rendered according to their treatment of Christ's 'Brethren' (Matthew 25: 31-46) identified by Scofield's dispensationalists as Jews. However, CHRIST identifies HIS brethren as being those NOT after the flesh, of his genetic family, but as those who were His DISCIPLES. (Matthew 12: 46-50)
For Scofield, the heart of the whole of the biblical message is Israel and 'the glorious future for Israel under the reign of Christ'. (Preface to 1917 edition p.x. The New Scofield Reference Bible, Oxford University Press, London, 1967.) In fact, Israel HAS replaced Christ. THIS is replacement theology!
Yet, it is CHRIST that the Law and Prophets point to: The Lamb of God who 'takes away the sin of the world'. ( John 1: 29) It is the promise of the Kingdom of God as Jesus declared: "The time is fulfilled, and the Kingdom of God is at hand; repent and put your trust in the Gospel". (Mark 1:15)
ISRAEL'S purpose was to bear and bring forth The Christ - The Messiah and to point to HIM as Lord and God, to declare HIM to the nations.
It was NOT Christ's purpose to extol Israel!
Israel broke her marriage Covenant with God time and again. God was long suffering, receiving the harlot back to Himself over and over. Finally, when confronted by Jesus with the parable of the 'Wicked Tenant Farmers', the chief priests and elders declared their own doom and just end: "He will bring those wretches to a wretched end, and will rent out the vineyard to other vine-growers ... ". (Matthew 21:33-46)
John the Baptist was to the point! Seeing the Pharisees and Sadducees, he said to them, "You brood of vipers, who warned you to flee from the wrath to come? ... and do not suppose that you can say to yourselves, 'We have Abraham for our father'; for I say to you, that God is able to from these stones to raise up children to Abraham. And the axe is already laid at the root of the trees; every tree therefore that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire." (Matthew 3:7-12)
The Apostle Paul was blunt! 'Now the promises were spoken to Abraham and to his seed. He does NOT say, "AND TO SEEDS," as referring to many, but rather to one, "AND TO YOUR SEED", THAT IS, Christ.' (Galatians 3:16) 'And if you are Christ's, then YOU are Abraham's offspring, heirs according to promise.' (Galatians 3:29)
Finally, Paul declares this: 'For it is written that Abraham had two sons, one by the bondwoman and one by the free woman. But the son by the bondwoman was born according to the FLESH, and the son of the free woman through the PROMISE. This contains an allegory: for these women are two covenants, one proceeding from Mount Sinai bearing children who are to be slaves; she is Hagar. Now this Hagar is Mount Sinai in Arabia, and corresponds to the present Jerusalem, for she is in slavery with her children.
But the Jerusalem above is free; she is our mother. And you brethren, like Isaac, are children of promise.
But at that time he who was born according to the flesh persecuted him who was born according to the Spirit, so it is now.
But what does the Scripture say?
"CAST OUT THE BONDWOMAN AND HER SON, FOR THE SON OF THE BONDWOMAN SHALL NOT BE AN HEIR WITH THE SON OF THE FREE WOMAN".' (Galatians 4:22-31)